The organic osmolytes betaine and proline are transported by a shared system in early preimplantation mouse embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Betaine and proline protect preimplantation mouse embryos against increased osmolarity and decreased cell volume, implying that they may function as organic osmolytes. However, the transport system(s) that mediates their accumulation in fertilized eggs and early embryos was unknown, and previously identified mammalian organic osmolyte transporters could not account for their transport. Here, we report that there is a single saturable transport component shared by betaine and proline in 1-cell mouse embryos. A series of inhibitors had nearly identical effects on both betaine and proline transport by this system. In addition, K(i) values for reciprocal inhibition of betaine and proline transport were approximately 100-300 microM, similar to K(m) values ( approximately 200-300 microM) for their transport, and both had similar maximal transport rates (V(max)). The K(i) values for inhibition of betaine and proline transport by dimethylglycine were similar ( approximately 2 mM), further supporting transport of both substrates by a single transport system. Finally, betaine and proline transport each required Na(+)- and Cl(-). These data were consistent with a single, Na(+)- and Cl(-)-requiring, betaine/proline transport system in 1-cell mouse embryos. While betaine was only transported by a single saturable system, we found an additional, less conspicuous proline transport route that was betaine-insensitive, Na(+)-sensitive, and inhibited by alanine, leucine, cysteine, and methionine. Furthermore, we showed that betaine, like proline, is present in the mouse oviduct and thus could serve as a physiological substrate. Finally, accumulation of both betaine and proline increased with increasing osmolarity, consistent with a possible role as organic osmolytes in early embryos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".