MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030448597 · doi:10.1139/z05-153

Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of <i>Bunodera</i> spp. (Trematoda: Allocreadiidae), parasites of percid and gasterosteid fishes

2005· article· en· W2030448597 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anindo Choudhury, Virginia León Règagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHolarcticGenusZoologyGasterosteusPhylogenetic treeCladeSticklebackFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsGeneFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Bunodera Railliet, 1896 is represented by five freshwater species: the holarctic B. luciopercae (Müller, 1776) in percids; the endemic North American B. sacculata VanCleave and Mueller, 1932 in percids; B. eucaliae (Miller, 1936) and B. inconstans (Lasee, Font and Sutherland, 1988) in freshwater sticklebacks; and the trans-Pacific B. mediovitellata Tsimbaliuk and Roytman, 1966 in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L., 1758). Partial sequences of the 28S ribosomal RNA gene were combined with morphological data for a phylogenetic analysis of Bunodera spp. Parsimony analysis of the combined data yielded a tree (consistency index = 0.84) that supports the following resolution: ((((B. luciopercae(((B. sacculata((B. mediovitellata(B. eucaliae + B. inconstans)))). The basal position of B. luciopercae is consistent with its holarctic distribution and a basal percid as its main host. The relatively basal positions of two typical perch parasites and the association of a more derived clade (B. mediovitellata + B. eucaliae + B. inconstans) with sticklebacks indicate host shifting from percids to sticklebacks. The sister relationships and North American endemicity of the two most derived species, B. eucaliae and B. inconstans, are also consistent with the more derived position of their typical host, the freshwater brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans (Kirtland, 1841)).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207