MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030463928 · doi:10.1115/1.2201614

Modeling of the Onset of Gas Entrainment From a Stratified Two-Phase Region Through Branches on a Curved Surface

2005· article· en· W2030463928 on OpenAlexaff
A. F. Andaleeb, Ibrahim Hassan, Wael Saleh, Tariq Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFroude numberEntrainment (biomusicology)MechanicsGeometryRange (aeronautics)HeaderOrientation (vector space)MathematicsGeologyPhysicsMeteorologyBreakupMaterials scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present investigation is focused on the onset phenomena from a stratified two-phase region through a single branch located on a semi-circular wall, resembling a circular reservoir of a CANDU header-feeder configuration. Two different models have been developed, over the whole range of branch Froude number, to predict the critical height at the onset of gas-entrainment. The results showed that there is both a maximum and a minimum physical limit of prediction, which depends on the branch size and configuration. Also, at a distinct range of Froude numbers within the physical limits, the predicted values of both models collaborated to the same values. The critical height corresponding to the onset of gas entrainment was found to be a function of the branch orientation and Froude number. Three different experimental data sets at branch orientation angles of zero, 45, and 90 degrees were used to validate the present models. A good concurrence was illustrated between the experimental and theoretical values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluids EngineeringSame topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207