Interactions between substrates and the haem-bound nitric oxide of ferric and ferrous bacterial nitric oxide synthases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here the resonance Raman spectra of the FeIII-NO and FeII-NO complexes of the bacterial NOSs (nitric oxide synthases) from Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. The haem-NO complexes of these bacterial NOSs displayed Fe-N-O frequencies similar to those of the mammalian NOSs, in presence and absence of L-arginine, indicating that haem-bound NO and L-arginine had similar haem environments in bacterial and mammalian NOSs. The only notable difference between the two types of NOS was the lack of change in Fe-N-O frequencies of the FeIII-NO complexes upon (6R) 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin binding to bacterial NOSs. We report, for the first time, the characterization of NO complexes with NOHA (N(omega)-hydroxy-L-arginine), the substrate used in the second half of the catalytic cycle of NOSs. In the FeIII-NO complexes, both L-arginine and NOHA induced the Fe-N-O bending mode at nearly the same frequency as a result of a steric interaction between the substrates and the haem-bound NO. However, in the FeII-NO complexes, the Fe-N-O bending mode was not observed and the nu(Fe-NO) mode displayed a 5 cm(-1) higher frequency in the complex with NOHA than in the complex with L-arginine as a result of direct interactions that probably involve hydrogen bonds. The different behaviour of the substrates in the FeII-NO complexes thus reveal that the interactions between haem-bound NO and the substrates are finely tuned by the geometry of the Fe-ligand structure and are relevant to the use of the FeII-NO complex as a model of the oxygenated complex of NOSs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".