Geochemistry of the Coastal Sonora batholith, Northwestern Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New major- and trace-element and radiogenic Sr and Nd data from granitic rocks help to characterize the geochemical composition of the Coastal Sonora batholith, which represents the westernmost portion of the Laramide Magmatic arc (~8040 Ma) in Mexico. Compared with more inland-located regions of the arc in central and eastern Sonora (Inner Granites), the plutons within the coastal batholith have higher MgO, FeO, and CaO and lower K2O contents, and tend to be more depleted in Nb, U, and to a lesser extent Rb, but relatively enriched in Sr. These rocks display flatter slopes of rare-earth elements, with La abundances around 80 to 200 times chondrite values and smaller but well-developed negative Eu anomalies. Initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios and εNd values from a few studied samples of the Coastal Sonora batholith range from 0.70586 to 0.70679 and from 2.3 to 4.7, respectively. These isotopic signatures allow recognition of a more mantle-related magma source for this batholith as compared with the Inner Granites, which have higher Sr and lower Nd ratios. In a more regional context, the compositions of the Coastal Sonora batholith rocks resemble those of the eastern portion of the Peninsular Ranges batholith to the northwest. Based on our observations, we propose that partial melting of a crust thickened by overlapping periods of Jurassic through Cretaceous arc magmatism along the southwestern edge of the North American continent may account for the geochemical and isotopic characteristics displayed by the Coastal Sonora batholith granitic rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".