Das Cronkhite-Canada-Syndrom: Eine seltene Differentialdiagnose der generalisierten gastrointestinalen Polyposis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HISTORY AND FINDINGS: A 56-year-old man was admitted to hospital because of chronic diarrhoea. 15 months earlier he had begun to notice changes in taste sensation, then nail discoloration and dystrophy as well as alopecia areata. On examination he was also found to have lower leg oedema and cutaneous hyperpigmentation. INVESTIGATIONS: Biochemical tests showed hypoproteinaemia with reduced serum total protein (4.2 g/dl) and albumin concentrations (2.0 g/dl), hypokalemia and hypocalcaemia, as well as zinc and vitamin B12 deficiency. Stool alpha 1-antitrypsin was raised to 5.9 mg/g. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 17/26 mm and C-reactive protein was raised to 6.9 mg/dl. Gastroscopy, coloscopy and small-intestine double contrast radiology (after Sellink) demonstrated multiple polyps, histologically revealing pseudopolypoid-inflammatory changes with cystic dilatation, consistent with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS), a condition characterised by the described endoscopic, radiological and histomorphological changes together with the characteristic ectodermal abnormalities. TREATMENT AND COURSE: At first only symptomatic measures were taken: fluid, electrolyte and protein infusions and administration of zinc and vitamin B12. Stool frequency was regulated by diet and medication. The patient was discharged in much improved general condition and closely followed clinically and endoscopically because of the relatively poor prognosis and frequent occurrence of adenomatous polyps which are at a high risk of malignant degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: In the differential diagnosis of generalised intestinal polyposis only careful investigation by endoscopy and radiology of the entire gastrointestinal tract with biopsies can identify CCS. While treatment is largely symptomatic, its poor prognosis calls for new therapeutic measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".