Finite-amplitude modulated Taylor-Couette flow
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Taylor-Couette flow with finite-amplitude modulated cylinders is examined in this study. A spectral/finite-difference approach is used based on domain transformation. The governing equations are mapped over the rectangular domain, and the flow field is represented spectrally in the axial direction, which, together with the Galerkin projection, led to a system of equations that are solved using a variable step finite-difference discretization. The vortex formation and pattern selection are examined after the validity of the method is established. The inner and outer cylinders are modulated in phase, and are free to co- or counter-rotate at different speed. It is found that the presence of modulation leads to the emergence of steady vortex flow even at vanishingly small Taylor number. The vortex structure is found to have the same periodicity as the forcing, even after the critical Taylor number corresponding to the onset of vortex flow straight cylinders is exceeded. The outer to inner cylinder velocity ratio controls not only the vortex strength and the nonlinearity but also the size, location, and breakup of the vortices. It is also found that the forcing wave number that generates the most intense vortex flow varies slightly with Ta and is different from the critical wave number predicted by linear stability analysis for straight cylinders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it