Abstract 4336: Oncolytic reovirus as a novel therapy for neuroblastoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Neuroblastoma (NB), a tumour of neurocrest progenitor cells of the sympathetic nervous system, is the most common extracranial pediatric tumour and accounts for approximately 15 percent of childhood cancer mortality. Even with surgery, radiation therapy, aggressive cytotoxic chemotherapy including autologous stem cell transplantation and more recently immunotherapy, high risk neuroblastoma has only a 30 percent predicted survival rate. Reovirus, a double-stranded RNA virus, has been shown to be effective against a myriad of cancers through its ability to preferentially lyse cancer cells with aberrant Ras pathway signaling. In this study, we investigate the potential of reovirus (serotype 3, strain Dearing) as a novel treatment for neuroblastoma and neuroblastoma tumour initiating cells (nbTIC). Experimental Design/Results: Reovirus induces dramatic cytotoxic effects at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 40 within 48h as assessed by WST-1 viability assays for the IMR-32, IMR-5, SK-N-AS, SK-N-SH, LAN-1, LAN-5, and SHEP human neuroblastoma cell lines in vitro. Interestingly the human neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cell lines, NB-12, NB88 and NB122 (kind gift from Dr David Kaplan) were also found to be very sensitive to reovirus-induced cytotoxicity, suggesting a role for reovirus treatment of refractory neuroblastoma. In order to further study reovirus, immunotherapy and neuroblastoma, a syngeneic, immunocompetent murine model (Neuro2a, A/J neuroblastoma model) was utilized to test reovirus-induced cytotoxicity and RV-directed immunotherapy of Neuro2A in vitro and in vivo. Preliminary data suggest that the Neuro2a cells are exquisitely sensitive to reovirus in vitro. Updated results will be presented. Conclusion: These preclinical results suggest that reovirus holds promise as a novel therapeutic for neuroblastoma and that it warrants further investigation in early phase clinical trials. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4336. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4336
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".