MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030702847 · doi:10.5539/ijms.v1n2p50

Comparative Study on Chinese and Foreign Natural Gas Consumption

2009· article· en· W2030702847 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Lv

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marketing Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
KeywordsNatural gasStatus quoConsumption (sociology)ChinaCoalFossil fuelNatural resource economicsEnergy consumptionOil consumptionEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental economicsBusinessEconomicsWaste managementEngineeringGeographyMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption in china mainly relies on coal and oil, however, burning coal, oil and other fossil fuel will cause acertain degree of environmental pollution inevitably, thus natural gas be used actively as a supplementary energy allover the world is a certain trend in the future. At present, developed countries use and consume natural gas arerelatively mature than others, and in this paper, we use comparative study methods, qualitative and quantitative analysis of natural gas consumption between China and abroad, compared analysis of the status quo and Problems of natural gas consumption, we give some suggestions to promote the consumption of natural gas tend to more rationalize.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marketing StudiesSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207