Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy of the Rat Hippocampus 1 Month after Exposure to<sup>56</sup>Fe-Particle Radiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The response of the central nervous system to space radiation is largely unknown. The hippocampus, which is known for its critical role in learning and memory, was evaluated for its response to heavy-ion radiation. At 1 month, animals exposed to brain-only 56Fe-particle irradiation (0-4 Gy) were examined using contrast-enhanced T1 imaging (CET1), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Correlative histology was performed after imaging. The T2WI, DWI and CET1 images revealed no overt anatomical changes after irradiation. Quantitative analysis demonstrated a significant increase in T2 at 2 Gy compared to 0 Gy. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) revealed an inverse dose-dependent quantitative change in water mobility. Compared to 0 Gy, the ADC increased 122% at 1 Gy and declined to 44% above control levels at 4 Gy. MRS showed a significant increase in the N-acetylaspartate/choline ratio at 4 Gy and a lactate peak. Histology demonstrated no overt pathological changes in neuronal and astrocyte populations. However, a significant inverse dose-dependent morphological change in the microglial population was detected in irradiated animals. Our results suggest that early tissue matrix modifications induced by 56Fe-particle radiation can be detected by MRI in the absence of evident histopathology. These changes may indicate fundamental changes in the structure and function of the hippocampus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".