Singularity-Free Kinematically Redundant Planar Parallel Mechanisms With Unlimited Rotational Capability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel family of singularity-free kinematically redundant planar parallel mechanisms that have unlimited rotational capabilities. The proposed mechanisms are akin to conventional three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel mechanisms. By introducing a novel kinematically redundant arrangement, four-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanisms are obtained that can completely alleviate singularities and provide unlimited rotational capabilities. The kinematics of the mechanisms are derived, and the Jacobian matrices are obtained. It is shown that the singularities of this type of mechanism are governed by the orientation of a passive link connecting the redundant leg to the platform and that the latter orientation is easily controlled using the kinematic redundancy, thereby alleviating all direct kinematic singularities. An example mechanism is proposed, and a prototype is demonstrated. Example trajectories that include full cycle rotations are shown. The prototype also illustrates the use of the kinematic redundancy for an auxiliary task, namely grasping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it