Eugenio Menegon . Ancestors, Virgins, and Friars: Christianity as a Local Religion in Late Imperial China . (Harvard‐Yenching Institute Monograph Series, number 69.) Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Asia Center . 2009 . Pp. xx, 450. $45.00.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the study of Christianity in late imperial China, Jesuit missionaries have long been the belles of the Beijing ball. At the time, their foreignness attracted and repelled emperors, and even today Italian youths can dance to lyrics about “Euclidean Jesuits/dressed as bonzes/to enter the imperial court/of the Ming dynasty.” In the intervening centuries, the Jesuits have perhaps commanded more than their fair share of historical scholarship. Eugenio Menegon's book breaks this gaze to focus on Christianity not as a global but as a local religion, not in Beijing but fifteen hundred kilometers south in Fujian province's Fuan county, nourished not by Jesuits but by mendicant priests. Thus at the outset it is clear we will be exploring new ground. The book's introduction and its first chapter provide methodological and historical context. Menegon then begins a chronological narrative, surveying in three chapters the history of Fuan Christianity from a 1634 incident of Christian iconoclasm against local gods up to the 1840s and the First Opium War. Chapter breaks occur first with the unexpected opportunities of the Ming‐Qing transition in 1645, and then with the 1723 imperial prohibitions on Christianity, which proved surprisingly ineffective. The book then shifts out of a temporal and into a more thematic and explanatory gear, exploring in turn the Fuan Christians' social organization, their priests and lay institutions, their ancestral rituals, and finally the women living chastely as beatas. Often Menegon finds “congruences” between Christianity and pre‐existing traditions, which facilitated the process of localization. At times, this work furnishes a social scientist's analysis: confession is psychologically reassuring, and celibacy “expresses agency” (p. 352). More often Menegon allows his subjects to speak for themselves, and they identify their own motivations as a fear of the consequence of original sin and a desire for heaven. A conclusion takes the story to the present. Menegon builds his account on a solid, expansive foundation of sources, manuscript and archival, in Chinese and European languages. Three maps, six images, a bibliography, an index, and a short essay on the sources complete the book, which is dense and detailed, demanding and rewarding slow and careful study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".