Tissue Classification Using Ultrasound-Induced Variations in Acoustic Backscattering Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) radio-frequency (RF) time series is an effective tissue classification method that enables accurate cancer diagnosis, but the mechanisms underlying this method are not completely understood. This paper presents a model to describe the variations in tissue temperature and sound speed that take place during the RF time series scanning procedures and relate these variations to US backscattering. The model was used to derive four novel characterization features. These features were used to classify three animal tissues, and they obtained accuracies as high as 88.01%. The performance of the proposed features was compared with RF time series features proposed in a previous study. The results indicated that the US-induced variations in tissue temperature and sound speed, which were used to derive the proposed features, were important contributors to the tissue typing capabilities of the RF time series. Simulations carried out to estimate the heating induced during the scanning procedure employed in this study showed temperature rises lower than 2 °C. The model and results presented in this paper can be used to improve the RF time series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".