MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review article: Managing bone complications after kidney transplantation

2009· review· en· W2030815541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone remodelingTransplantationKidney diseasePopulationBone mineralKidney transplantationOsteoporosisVitamin D and neurologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) describes the laboratory, bone and vascular abnormalities that exist in patients with CKD stages 3-5D and that may persist after transplantation. Persisting abnormalities of bone turnover and abnormal mineralization, together with bone mineral density (BMD) loss from glucocorticoids, may all predispose to a loss of structural integrity and increased fracture risk in kidney and kidney pancreas recipients. Vitamin D, calcitriol, calcitonin and bisphosphonates have all been used to preserve BMD following transplantation, despite a lack of safety data and the potential for some of these drugs to cause harm. A limited number of post-transplant studies utilizing these drugs have not yet documented improved fracture prevention or fracture-related mortality and have not considered allocation based on risk factors for fracture or markers of bone turnover. Targeted allocation of the available therapies based on a stratification of risk appears warranted. This might be achieved using an algorithm incorporating BMD, X-ray evaluation, laboratory investigations including bone turnover markers and the assessment of standard fracture risk factors at the time of and soon after transplantation. This approach, which is similar to protocols used in the general population, may result in more effective management of patients and fewer adverse effects such as adynamic bone disease. Although BMD is a surrogate for fracture risk in the general population it is not validated in this transplant population. Consequently, such an approach should be confirmed by studies that include bone biopsy data and an evaluation of patient level outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it