MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030818491 · doi:10.1177/0021998305050738

Finite Element Modeling of a Membrane Sector of a Satellite Reflector Made of Triaxial Composites

2005· article· en· W2030818491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)Materials scienceStiffnessComposite materialStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single layers of triaxial woven fabric composites have been used to make communication satellite reflectors due to their extremely light weight with good stiffness and strength property. Special superfinite elements have been developed for the analysis of these lightweight materials. These superfinite elements are used for the deflection and stress analysis of a membrane sector of the satellite reflector subjected to lateral pressure. Due to the significant difference in the size of the satellite structure (order of meters) and the size of the superfinite elements (order of millimeters) it is not possible to model the satellite structure using the superfinite elements and computer facilities available in most labs (personal computers). In the process of finding a solution to this problem, a special similitude behavior for the deflection of the curved panels made of triaxial fabrics was discovered. Using this behavior, the deflection of a large-size reflector panel (order of meters) can be analyzed using models in the millimeters size range. Stresses in the triax reflector model were also calculated. However, no special similitude behavior was obtained for the stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it