Studying natural structural protein fibers by solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As a consequence of evolutionary pressure, various organisms have developed structural fibers displaying a range of exceptional mechanical properties adapted specifically to their functions. An understanding of these properties at the molecular level requires a detailed description of local structure, orientation with respect to the fiber and size of constitutive units, and dynamics on various timescales. The size and lack of long‐range order in these protein systems constitute an important challenge to classical structural techniques such as high‐resolution NMR and X‐ray diffraction. Solid‐state NMR overcomes these constraints and is uniquely suited to the study of these inherently disordered systems. Solid‐state NMR experiments developed or applied to determine structure, orientation, and dynamics of these complex proteins will be reviewed and illustrated through examples of their applications to fibers such as spider and silkworm silks, collagen, elastin, and keratin. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 34A: 24–27, 2009.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".