MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030868950 · doi:10.1364/josaa.24.001647

Rigorous formulation for electromagnetic plane-wave scattering from a general-shaped groove in a perfectly conducting plane

2007· letter· en· W2030868950 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Sujeet K. Chaudhuri, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini, H.J. Eom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America A · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroove (engineering)Mathematical analysisIntegral equationBoundary value problemScatteringFourier seriesFourier transformPlane (geometry)HarmonicOpticsPlane waveField (mathematics)PhysicsGeometryMathematicsMaterials scienceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scattering of an obliquely incident plane wave by a general-shaped groove engraved on a perfectly conducting plane is rigorously solved. The scattered field is represented by a Fourier-integral representation. To analytically represent the fields in a general-shaped groove, the groove is divided into L number of layers. Fields are then expressed in each layer as summations of 2D spatial harmonic fields with unknown coefficients. Matching the boundary conditions between layers provides a linear set of equations connecting all the unknown harmonic coefficients. Judicious use of Fourier transform on the equations resulting from matching boundary conditions at the groove aperture provides a series representation of the scattered field in the spectral domain with unknown harmonic coefficients of the first layer in the groove. A stable solution is obtained by solving the complete system of equations with an adaptive choice for the number of modes in each layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America ASame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207