<i>Critical Studies on Security</i>: an introduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. To be precise, the conference was hosted by the York Centre for International and Strategic Studies. The Centre's name was changed in 1996 in response to the same political and intellectual developments that gave rise to Critical Security Studies. 2. Perhaps the most striking instance of the difficulty of mixing forms was William Wallace's 'Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats' (Wallace Citation1996). The talk developed an elaborate metaphor of monastic orders to talk about the divisions and orthodoxies of International Relations. As with any such metaphor, the further it was pushed, the more it would break down. For an after dinner speech, pushing it some distance was quite funny; however, the article which followed found its important, and still influential, argument tarnished somewhat by the vestiges of the monasticism. 3. One of the most important moments in the emergence of critical International Relations more broadly was the publication in 1990 of a special issue of International Studies Quarterly, the lead house journal of the International Studies Association, edited by Richard Ashley and RBJ Walker titled: 'Speaking the Language of Exile' (Ashley and Walker Citation1990). 4. Peace Research, which grew in through the 1970s and into the 1980s to become a dominant site of opposition to traditional strategic studies, is an obvious exception, as it quite explicitly engaged with the dominant discourse with that discourse's own quantitative tools. See the Journal of Peace Research, throughout its history, for examples of this excellent work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it