MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Looking Away From Whiplash: Effect of Head Rotation in Rear Impacts

2005· article· en· W2030884997 on OpenAlexaff
Shrawan Kumar, Robert Ferrari, Yogesh Narayan

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhiplashTorsoSternocleidomastoid muscleMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomyElectromyographyAccelerationRotation (mathematics)Poison controlPhysicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Twenty healthy volunteers in a laboratory were subjected to rear-end impacts 4.4, 7.9, 10.9, and 13.1 m/s acceleration, with head rotation to the right and left. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the response of the cervical muscles to increasing low-velocity rear impacts when the head is rotated at the time of impact. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A previous study of rear impacts with head in neutral posture suggests that the burden of impact is borne primarily by the sternocleidomastoid muscles bilaterally. To improve automobile designs to prevent whiplash injury, we need to understand the response of the cervical muscles to whiplash-type perturbations in less-than-ideal conditions, such as when the head is rotated to the right and left at the time of rear-end impact. METHODS: Triaxial accelerometers recorded the acceleration of the sled, torso at the shoulder level, and head of the participant, while bilateral electromyograms of the sternocleidomastoids, trapezii, and splenii capitis were also recorded. RESULTS: For participants having a rear-end impact, whether having the head rotated to the left or right at the time of impact, the muscle responses increased with increasing levels of acceleration (P < 0.01). The time to onset and time to peak electromyogram for all muscles progressively decreased with increasing levels of acceleration (P < 0.01). Which muscle responded most to a whiplash-type neck perturbation was determined by the direction of head rotation. With the head rotated to the left, the right sternocleidomastoid generated 88% of the maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram (at least triple the response of other muscles). In comparison, the left sternocleidomastoid, both trapezii, and the splenii capitis generated on average only 10% to 30% of the maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram with head rotated to the left. On the other hand, with the head rotated to the right, the left sternocleidomastoid generated 94% of the maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram (again, at least triple the response of other muscles). CONCLUSIONS: If the head is rotated out of neutral posture at the time of rear impact, the injury risk tends to be greater for the sternocleidomastoid muscle contralateral to the side of rotation. Measures to prevent whiplash injury may have to account for the asymmetric response because many victims of whiplash are expected to be looking to the left or right at the time of collision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207