MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assignment of the optical spectrum of metal porphyrin and phthalocyanine radical anions

2001· article· en· W2030930667 on OpenAlexafffund
John Mack, Martin J. Stillman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnetic circular dichroismChemistryZINDOPhthalocyaninePorphyrinPhotochemistryVisible spectrumAbsorption spectroscopyCircular dichroismSpectral lineAbsorption (acoustics)Atomic electron transitionCrystallographyMoleculeOpticsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The approach developed previously to assign the major π → π* and π* → π* bands in the optical spectra of metallophthalocyanine radical species [ MPc (−n)] (n−2)− (n = 1–6), which was based on spectral band deconvolution analyses of the UV-vis absorption and magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectra and ZINDO calculations, is reviewed in this paper and extended to the major bands observed in the spectrum of the zinc tetraphenylporphyrin radical anion [ ZnTPP (−3)] − . The magnetic circular dichroism spectrum is dominated by an intense pseudo A term associated with the B (or Soret) transition with bands at 445 and 465 nm. Weaker bands associated with the π* → π* transition out of the partially filled LUMO give rise to two widely separated, oppositely signed, coupled B terms in the MCD spectrum at 538 and 910 nm. The Q transition is assigned to a weak absorption band at 750 nm and a shoulder slightly to the blue at 728 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Porphyrins and PhthalocyaninesSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207