MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030964324 · doi:10.1117/1.oe.53.8.084109

Modified sinusoidal fringe-pattern projection for variable illuminance in phase-shifting three-dimensional surface-shape metrology

2014· article· en· W2030964324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIlluminanceOpticsStructured-light 3D scannerRoot mean squareProjection (relational algebra)MetrologyMean squared errorMathematicsPhysicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A camera-independent method of avoiding image saturation using modified sinusoidal fringe-pattern projection to reduce surface measurement error and thus accommodate variable illuminance in phase-shifting surface-shape measurement is presented. The maximum input gray level (MIGL) in the projected patterns is reduced to an optimal tradeoff point, below which the intensity modulation, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio would diminish the advantage of further MIGL reduction. Measurement simulations using 31 MIGL values, from 105 to 255 in increments of 5, demonstrated reductions in root-mean-square errors for ambient illuminance of 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, and 900 lx, from 0.38, 0.56, 0.86, 1.21, 85, and 373 mm, respectively, at 255 MIGL, to 0.31 to 0.32 mm at the optimum MIGL. The advantage of the method was confirmed in real measurements of a flat plate and human masks. The ability to perform camera-independent measurements under variable lighting conditions and surface reflectivity may lead to more practical measurements in uncontrolled environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it