MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030966685 · doi:10.1177/0142331207080153

Real-time process monitoring of micromoulding using integrated ultrasonic sensors

2007· article· en· W2030966685 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuu Ono, B. R. Whiteside, E. C. Brown, Makiko Kobayashi, Chin‐Chi Cheng, C. K. Jen, Phil Coates

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsUltrasonic sensorMaterials scienceExtrusionBarrel (horology)Process (computing)ShrinkageAcousticsUltrasonic testingInsert (composites)Composite materialMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time, non-intrusive and non-destructive process monitoring of micromoulding has been performed using novel ultrasonic sensors integrated onto the barrel and mould insert with an ultrasonic pulse-echo technique. The relative variation of the polymer melt temperature inside the extrusion barrel can be obtained using the ultrasonic velocities of the melt measured at the barrel during extrusion. Melt flow arrival in the mould, and solidification, shrinkage and detachment of the polymer inside the mould cavity are also successfully monitored. The presented ultrasonic sensors and technique enable optimizing the micromoulding process, and improving quality of the moulded parts and process efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and ControlSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207