New Insights into the Role of the N Terminus in Conformational Transitions of the Na,K-ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deletion of 32 residues from the N terminus of the alpha1 catalytic subunit of the rat Na,K-ATPase (mutant alpha1M32) shifts the E(1)/E(2) conformational equilibrium toward E(1), and the combination of this deletion with mutation E233K in the M2-M3 loop acts synergistically to shift the conformation further toward E(1) (Boxenbaum, N., Daly, S. E., Javaid, Z. Z., Lane, L. K., and Blostein, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23086-23092). To delimit the region of the cytoplasmic N terminus involved in these interactions, the consequences of a series of N-terminal deletions of alpha1 beyond Delta32 were evaluated. Criteria to assess shifts in conformational equilibrium were based on effects of perturbation of the entire catalytic cycle ((i) sensitivity to vanadate inhibition, (ii) K(+) sensitivity of Na-ATPase measured at micromolar ATP, (iii) changes in K'(ATP), and (iv) catalytic turnover), as well as estimates of the rates of the conformational transitions of phospho- and dephosphoenzyme (E(1)P --> E(2)P and E(2)(K(+)) --> E(1) + K(+)). The results show that, compared with alpha1M32, the deletion of up to 40 residues (alpha1M40) further shifts the poise toward E(1). Remarkably, further deletions (mutants alpha1M46, alpha1M49, and alpha1M56) reverse the effect, such that these mutants increasingly resemble the wild type alpha1. These results suggest novel intramolecular interactions involving domains within the N terminus that impact the manner in which the N terminus/M2-M3 loop regulatory domain interacts with the M4-M5 catalytic loop to effect E(1) <--> E(2) transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".