MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031016640 · doi:10.1525/phr.2009.78.3.460

Review: <i>Landing Native Fisheries: Indian Reserves and Fishing Rights in British Columbia, 1849–1925</i>, by Douglas C. Harris and <i>The Fishermen's Frontier: People and Salmon in Southeast Alaska</i>, by David F. Arnold and William Cronon

2009· article· en· W2031016640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierFishingIconCitationFisheryHistoryDownloadGeographyLibrary scienceArchaeologyPolitical scienceLawWorld Wide WebBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| August 01 2009 Review: Landing Native Fisheries: Indian Reserves and Fishing Rights in British Columbia, 1849–1925, by Douglas C. Harris and The Fishermen's Frontier: People and Salmon in Southeast Alaska, by David F. Arnold and William Cronon Landing Native Fisheries: Indian Reserves and Fishing Rights in British Columbia, 1849–1925. By Douglas C. Harris. (Vancouver, UBC Press, 2008. xiv + 271 pp. $85 cloth, $32.95 paper)The Fishermen's Frontier: People and Salmon in Southeast Alaska. By David F. Arnold; foreword by William Cronon. (Seattle, University of Washington Press, 2008. xvii + 270 pp. $35) Joseph E. Taylor, III Joseph E. Taylor, III University of Portland Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Pacific Historical Review (2009) 78 (3): 460–463. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2009.78.3.460 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Joseph E. Taylor; Review: Landing Native Fisheries: Indian Reserves and Fishing Rights in British Columbia, 1849–1925, by Douglas C. Harris and The Fishermen's Frontier: People and Salmon in Southeast Alaska, by David F. Arnold and William Cronon. Pacific Historical Review 1 August 2009; 78 (3): 460–463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2009.78.3.460 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentPacific Historical Review Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2009 by the Regents of the University of California Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific Historical ReviewSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207