MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031033235 · doi:10.1080/00268970010034559

Exchange-Coulomb potential energy surfaces and related physical properties for Ne-N <sub>2</sub>

2001· article· en· W2031033235 on OpenAlexaff
Ashok K. Dham, William J. Meath

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirial coefficientInteratomic potentialPotential energyvan der Waals forceAtomic physicsIsotopomersChemistryPotential energy surfaceSpectral lineRayleigh scatteringLennard-Jones potentialPair potentialMolecular physicsPhysicsThermodynamicsMolecular dynamicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An exchange-Coulomb (XC) potential energy model is developed for the Ne-N2 interaction. The construction of this new potential energy surface is based on recent results for the Heitler-London interaction energy, the long range dispersion energies, and the microwave spectra of the dimer. The adjustable parameters in the final XC1 potential energy surface have been determined by fitting the frequencies of three representative lines of the microwave spectrum for the two isotopomers 20Ne-14N2 and 20Ne-15N2 while simultaneously maintaining agreement with the experimental second virial coefficient data obtained with the initial (unadjusted XC0 potential. With no further adjustment of parameters, the final XC potential reproduces, within 0.005%, the frequencies of the 34 microwave transitions studied experimentally for four isotopomers of Ne-N2. Excellent agreement with experiment is obtained also for the binary diffusion, the interaction viscosity, and the mixture viscosity (for all compositions) coefficients for all temperatures. Agreement with experiment for the relaxation cross-sections associated with viscomagnetic effects, and with the pressure broadening of depolarized Rayleigh light scattering, is very good given the level of computation used for the calculations and the accuracy with which some of these cross-sections currently can be determined from experimental data. Comparisons are made with predictions calculated from the three best literature potential energy surfaces or Ne-N2. The final XC1 potential energy surface is overall the most reliable potential energy for this van der Waals complex to date. The flexibility still inherent in this potential can be exploited, if required, in future studies of the Ne-N2 system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207