Territoire, langues et sphères publiques : enjeux identitaires et défis structurels de la cohabitation linguistique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les revendications traditionnelles des communautés francophones minoritaires visent l’accès à des services publics ou la gestion d’institutions dans leur langue. Ces revendications sont légitimées par laLoi sur les langues officielleset s’appuient sur des arguments légaux. Or, des luttes récentes menées dans des municipalités de l’Ontario et du Nouveau-Brunswick pour légiférer les langues d’affichage commercial ont déplacé les enjeux linguistiques dans la sphère et dans l’espace publics, faisant apparaître le paysage comme nouvel enjeu. Ce texte porte sur la mobilisation pour légiférer les langues d’affichage commercial dans le Grand Moncton. Cette revendication a fait apparaître quelques dynamiques structurelles d’une sphère publique et d’un territoire bilingue et a mis en évidence quelques limites des sciences sociales francophones en milieu minoritaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".