Properties analysis of novel composites for space robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basing on modeling analysis of kinematics and dynamics of the innovational spacecraft‐space robots, increasingly complex space operations require the advanced composites to have excellent mechanical properties at high frequency. The novel powdery nitrile butadiene rubbers (P‐NBRs) are performed to fabricate the P‐NBRs/cyanate esters (P‐NBRs/CE) and P‐NBRs/glass fiber/CE (P‐NBRs/GF/CE) composites. Results show that the flexural and impact strength of the P‐NBRs/CE composites are increased firstly, but decreased with the excessive addition of P‐NBRs. The heat resistant properties of the P‐NBRs/CE composites are decreased with the increasing addition of P‐NBRs. However, the mechanical properties of P‐NBRs/GF/CE composites are decreased with the increasing addition of P‐NBRs. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss of the P‐NBRs/GF/CE composites are increased with the increasing addition of P‐NBRs. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:564–569, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".