Simultaneous acceleration of the cell cycle and suppression of apoptosis by splice variant delta‐6 of the candidate tumour suppressor LUCA‐15/RBM5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The short arm of chromosome 3 is thought to include one or more tumour suppressor genes (TSGs), since carcinoma of various tissues display deletions in this region. Many genes mapping to this region have recently been identified, including the LUCA-15/RBM5 gene. RESULTS: In this study we report the cloning from human bone marrow library of a splice variant of LUCA-15 which lacks exon 6, resulting in a frameshift and producing a truncated protein of 150 amino acids instead of 815 amino acids. This variant is widely expressed at a low level in normal tissues and is expressed at increased levels in T-leukaemic cell lines. Over-expression of this splice variant after electroporation both shortened the cell cycle and inhibited CD95-mediated apoptosis in CEM-C7 T-cells. In marked contrast, over-expression of the full length LUCA-15/RBM5 suppressed cell proliferation both by inducing apoptosis and by extending the G1 phase of the cell cycle. CONCLUSION: These results, taken together with previous observations from ourselves and others, suggest that LUCA-15 is involved in the control of both apoptosis and the cell cycle. Since oncogenesis often relies on separate changes in molecules regulating apoptosis on the one hand, and proliferation, on the other, the discovery of a candidate tumour suppressor gene which affects both processes simultaneously is likely to be of major significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".