MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031080069 · doi:10.7202/1024954ar

Utilisation du Mini Entrevues Multiples en contexte francophone

2014· article· fr· W2031080069 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Christina St‐Onge, Daniel Côté, Carlos Brailovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMesure et évaluation en éducation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Education and Admissions
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le succès académique antérieur s’avère le meilleur prédicteur du succès académique en médecine, mais cet indicateur n’informe en rien quant aux habiletés non cognitives des candidats. Le Mini Entrevues Multiples (MEM), une mesure d’habiletés non cognitives, démontre une bonne fidélité et validité prédictive. L’objectif de la présente étude était de mesurer la fidélité du MEM UdeS élaboré et administré dans le cadre du processus de sélection au doctorat en médecine de l’Université de Sherbrooke. Les résultats observés démontrent la fidélité de l’outil, et ce, dans un contexte d’administration différent des études précédentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMesure et évaluation en éducationSame topicMedical Education and AdmissionsFrench-language works237,207