Ediacaran U–Pb zircon dates for the Lac Matapédia and Mt. St.-Anselme basalts of the Quebec Appalachians: support for a long-lived mantle plume during the rifting phase of Iapetus opening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been suggested that the rifting phase of Iapetus Ocean opening in Quebec involved a long-lived mantle plume centered near the Sutton Mountains whose dominant magmatism was first of continental flood basalt composition and later of ocean-island basalt (OIB) composition. We dated the Lac Matapédia and Mt. St.-Anselme basalts, which are thought to have originated from this plume and have dominant OIB-like composition. The U–Pb dating was done on individual zircon crystals using a laser ablation microprobe linked to an inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometer. Zircons from two basalt flows at Lac Matapédia yielded ages of 565 ± 6 and 556 ± 5 Ma. Zircons from a basalt flow at Mt. St.-Anselme yielded an age of 550 ± 7 Ma. Although the basalts are allochthonous, these should be their ages of extrusion onto Laurentia, as shown by Grenvillian ages yielded by inherited zircons in both Lac Matapédia flows and by zircons in a granitic pebble from the Mt. St.-Anselme Formation. Our dating supports the hypothesis of a long-lived (~615 to ~550 Ma) Sutton Mountains mantle plume involved in Iapetus rifting. It does so by closing a possible gap of ~10 Ma between the end of flood basalt and the beginning of OIB magmatism, and by supporting ~540 (rather than ~570) Ma for the rift-to-drift transition in Quebec. Because plumes move slowly, this hypothesis implies that Laurentia moved slowly from ~615 to ~550 Ma. This is consistent with paleomagnetic evidence, although very rapid true polar wander at ~590 Ma may need to be invoked.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".