Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Benign Intracranial Tumors: A New Variant of Gardner's Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is associated with malignant tumors of the central nervous system, predominantly medulloblastomas and glioblastoma multiforme (Turcot's syndrome) and with craniofacial osteomas (Gardner's syndrome). This report details the occurrence of benign, intracranial tumors in two related individuals with Gardner's syndrome, an association not previously described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 57-year-old woman (the propositus), her sister, two of her nieces and one of her grandnephews were previously diagnosed with Gardner's syndrome. The propositus came to neurosurgical attention because of vertigo associated with what proved to be an epidermoid cyst of the cerebellopontine angle. Her unaffected children and her relatives with Gardner's syndrome were examined and underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A 39-year-old woman with Gardner's syndrome, the niece of the propositus, was found to harbor an asymptomatic left frontal meningioma. DISCUSSION: Familial adenomatous polyposis, Gardner's syndrome, and that variant of Turcot's syndrome in which medulloblastoma predominate, are associated with a mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. The demonstration that patients with Gardner's syndrome can also have benign, nonneuroglial, intracranial tumors adds to the previously known extracolonic lesions associated with FAP. The molecular characterization of our patients should reveal if benign intracranial tumors represent a pleiotropic manifestation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene mutation or if other genes are implicated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".