MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031132226 · doi:10.1118/1.2240238

SU‐EE‐A4‐06: A Novel Approach for Metal Artifacts Reduction Due to Tooth Filling

2006· article· en· W2031132226 on OpenAlexaff
Mehran Yazdi, Luc Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Projection (relational algebra)ThresholdingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceReduction (mathematics)Computer visionScannerMissing dataArtifact (error)Path (computing)Table (database)Iterative reconstructionMotion (physics)AlgorithmMathematicsImage (mathematics)GeometryData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The aim of this study is to present a conceptually new method for metal artifact reduction (MAR), especially for patients who have multiple metal objects with small sizes. Metallic implants such as dental fillings cause serious artifacts in reconstructed CT images. Although the previous methods based on conventional projection‐interpolation successfully reduced artifacts in the case of large metal objects such as hip prostheses, their performance appears to depend highly on the complexity of the structures examined and they are very sensitive in correctly detection of missing projections resulting still many artifacts in the final reconstruction for the case of multiple‐near metal objects. Methods and Materials: The proposed method is based on modifying the raw CT data acquired during patient's examination. First, the projection data affected by metal objects (missing projections) are detected in sinogram using a simple thresholding algorithm. Then, the missing projections are replaced by corresponding 180 degrees projections, which are not affected by metal objects. The idea beyond the replacing scheme is due to the fact that the two projections along the same path but in the opposite sides would be the same in the absence of table motion. So, in the presence of table motion, like an helical CT exam, the opposite side projections still constitute very good approximations for the corresponding missing projections. In order to make the replacing scheme more reliable, we start the process simultaneously from each side of missing projections area. Finally, the modified sinogram is transferred back to the CT scanner device where CT slices are regenerated using the built‐in reconstruction operator. Experimental Results: The resulting tomography by the proposed approach show significant improvements in image quality, especially for regions near the metallic implants, compared to those by interpolation‐based approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207