MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2031171831 · doi:10.1021/jp014299z

High-Resolution Laser Spectroscopy of CaS:  Deperturbation Analysis of the AΣ<sup>+</sup>−X<sup>1</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup> Transition

2002· article· en· W2031171831 on OpenAlexaff
Todd C. Melville, John A. Coxon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySpectroscopyAtomic physicsExcitationSpectral lineResolution (logic)Line (geometry)LaserExcited stateHigh resolutionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The A 1 Σ + −X 1 Σ + electronic transition in CaS has been rotationally analyzed using high-resolution, laser excitation spectroscopy. Doppler-limited spectra were recorded for the 0−0, 1−0, 1−1, 2−1, 3−1, 3−2, 4−2, 4−3, 5−3, 5−4, 6−4 and 6−5 bands with a measurement precision of approximately 0.003 cm -1 . In total, more than 1200 line positions have been measured, assigned and employed in least-squares fits of molecular parameters. The A 1 Σ + state is extensively perturbed and level crossings have been identified and analyzed in the A 1 Σ + υ = 3, 4, 5, and 6 vibrational levels. The perturbations are believed to arise from interactions of the A 1 Σ + state with the a 3 Π and A ‘ 1 Π states. Term values and effective rotational parameters for the perturbing states are obtained through a partial deperturbation analysis of the perturbed bands. Estimated values of the principal molecular parameters are T 00 = 15194.428(2) cm -1, R e ‘ = 2.38626(16) Å, and ω e ‘ = 409.077(9) cm -1 for the A 1 Σ + state, and R e ‘ ‘ = 2.31770(14) Å and ω e ‘ ‘ = 462.273(12) cm -1 for the X 1 Σ + state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A→Same topicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications→French-language works237,207→