The local ventilation system coupled with the indirect green façade: a priliminary study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Green faades are becoming an important architectural element in an urban environment. Regarding the technology of the installation of green faades, one can distinguish between direct and indirect green faades, living walls and double skin faades with foliage. In addition to aesthetics of green faades, an impact on the outdoor and the indoor comfort has been proven. That is due to changed temperature and air fl ow conditions at the building envelope boundary. It has been proven that green faades impact lower surface temperatures of a building envelope and enhance thermal insulation properties of a building envelope, thus reducing the energy demand of a building. Based on the results from green faade thermal response research and growing interest in local ventilation systems, one can conclude that there is potential for a free cooling of a building. Therefore, this paper presents the design and the preliminary experimental research of a local ventilation system coupled with an indirect green faade. Based on the experimental work, it has been ascertained that the indirect green faade can impact a 5 K lower inlet air temperature for the local ventilation system compared with the one at the traditional faade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".