The local ventilation system coupled with the indirect green façade: a priliminary study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Green façades are becoming an important architectural element in an urban environment.Regarding the technology of the installation of green façades, one can distinguish between direct and indirect green façades, living walls and double skin façades with foliage.In addition to aesthetics of green façades, an impact on the outdoor and the indoor comfort has been proven.That is due to changed temperature and air fl ow conditions at the building envelope boundary.It has been proven that green façades impact lower surface temperatures of a building envelope and enhance thermal insulation properties of a building envelope, thus reducing the energy demand of a building.Based on the results from green façade thermal response research and growing interest in local ventilation systems, one can conclude that there is potential for a free cooling of a building.Therefore, this paper presents the design and the preliminary experimental research of a local ventilation system coupled with an indirect green façade.Based on the experimental work, it has been ascertained that the indirect green façade can impact a 5 K lower inlet air temperature for the local ventilation system compared with the one at the traditional façade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".