MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031192744 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeu292

Structural and functional alterations of the right ventricle are common in adults operated for ventricular septal defect as toddlers

2014· article· en· W2031192744 on OpenAlex
Johan Heiberg, Steffen Ringgaard, Michael Rahbek Schmidt, Andrew Redington, Vibeke E. Hjortdal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVentricleCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Patients with a surgically closed ventricular septal defect (VSD) contribute significantly to the increasing number of adults with congenital heart disease. The chronic effects of prior adverse haemodynamics in this population are incompletely understood. Our objective was to assess postoperative cardiac function and morphology in adult survivors of surgery in childhood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 27), median surgical age of 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-2.8 years) and 20.5 (95% CI 19.6-22.1 years) at the time of examination, and age-matched controls (n = 28) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We performed offline analyses of biventricular cardiac deformations, myocardial mass indices, flow patterns, and chamber areas and dimensions. In comparison with controls, VSD-operated patients had higher right ventricular (RV) areas; 36.8 ± 9.0 vs. 30.4 ± 6.4 cm(2) in end-diastole, P < 0.01, and 21.3 ± 5.9 vs. 16.0 ± 3.9 cm(2) in end-systole, P < 0.01. Furthermore, we found that fractional area change was lower among VSD-operated patients compared with controls; 0.42 ± 0.07 vs. 0.47 ± 0.05, P < 0.01, and we demonstrated a higher RV mass index in the VSD cohort compared with controls, P < 0.01. Radial strain was higher in the VSD group compared with controls; 30.2 ± 10.4 vs. 22.4 ± 7.7%, P < 0.01, whereas no difference was found in longitudinal strain; -20.1 ± 3.8% among VSD-operated patients vs. -21.5 ± 4.7% among controls, P = 0.28. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular function is normal, but changes in RV structure and function are demonstrable 20 years after surgical closure of VSD. The mechanisms and implications for these findings justify a further study in this increasingly large population of adult survivors of early surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it