MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031204309 · doi:10.7202/040373ar

La réglementation des sondages au Canada et l’élection de 1993

2008· article· fr· W2031204309 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Guy Lachapelle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de science politique · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis l’élection fédérale de 1993, le Canada s’est joint aux nombreux pays qui depuis plusieurs années se sont dotés d’une législation réglementant les sondages d’opinion lors des campagnes électorales. L’article 322.1 de la nouvelle Loi électorale du Canada , la loi C-114, instaure un black-out de 72 heures à la fin des campagnes électorales fédérales et interdit la publication de nouveaux sondages à partir de minuit, le vendredi, jusqu’à la fermeture des bureaux de scrutin. Tous les partis politiques fédéraux ont endossé cet article de la loi. Cet essai présente les principes qui ont milité en faveur de l’introduction de cette disposition, l’une des moins restrictives des pays ayant choisi la voix de la réglementation, et affirme que le black-out constitue une limite acceptable à la liberté de presse et au droit des citoyens à avoir une information de qualité. Cette disposition assure également aux candidats de tous les partis un traitement équitable de la part des médias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de science politiqueSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207