MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031216054 · doi:10.1029/2003gl019306

Tharsis as a consequence of Mars' dichotomy and layered mantle

2004· article· en· W2031216054 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. Wenzel, Michael Manga, M. Jellinek

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTharsisGeologyMartianMars Exploration ProgramVolcanoUpwellingMantle (geology)AstrobiologyEarth scienceGeophysicsMartian surfaceMantle plumeHesperianLithosphereTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two most striking features of the martian surface topography are the Tharsis rise and the crustal dichotomy. Closely associated with Tharsis are several large volcanoes, active in the geologically recent past, indicating a longevity of volcanic activity at Tharsis that is unique in the solar system. Using analogue laboratory experiments we examine the dynamical effects of the crustal dichotomy and a layered mantle on the thermal evolution of Mars. We show that in combination these two effects lead to the formation of a large‐scale upwelling under the southern highlands that appears early and endures for many billions of years. The upwelling comprises several persistent narrow plumes, which can explain the long‐lived Tharsis volcanoes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207