Phenotypic Variability of Krabbe Disease Across the Lifespan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Krabbe disease (galactocerebrosidase deficiency) is an inherited leukodystrophy that results in severe neurological defects due to altered myelination. Classically, disease onset is within the first year of life. Juvenile and adult-onset cases may have less classic presentations, making diagnosis difficult and often delayed. Here, we review the literature to demonstrate the hetereogeneity of presenting symptoms across all age groups. We also discuss diagnostic approach, emphasizing variation in biochemical, functional, and genetic results among Krabbe phenotypes. Better understanding of the various Krabbe disease phenotypes is critical to facilitate timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment of this clinically heterogeneous disorder. Variabilité phénotypique dans la maladie de Krabbe au cours de la vie du patient. La maladie de Krabbe (déficit en galactocérébrosidase) est une leukodystrophie héréditaire qui donne lieu à des déficits neurologiques sévères dus à un trouble de la myélinisation. Chez les cas dont la présentation est classique, la maladie débute au cours de la première année de vie. Si la maladie commence chez un adolescent ou un adulte, le mode de présentation peut-ětre moins classique, ce qui rend le diagnostic difficile et souvent tardif. Nous analysons les articles traitant du sujet pour démontrer l'hétérogénéité des symptômes au moment de la première consultation et ceci dans tous les groupes d'âge. Nous discutons également de l'approche diagnostique en mettant l'emphase sur la variation des résultats biochimiques, fonctionnels et génétiques des différents phénotypes dans la maladie de Krabbe. Une meilleure compréhension des différents phénotypes est cruciale pour faciliter un diagnostic précoce et un traitement approprié de cette maladie dont le mode de présentation clinique est hétérogène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".