A Design‐Oriented Approach to Strength Distribution in Single‐Story Asymmetric Systems with Elements Having Strength‐Dependent Stiffness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have pointed out that the stiffness and strength of many lateral force‐resisting elements (LFRE) are dependent parameters. This paper examines the implication of this finding in the distribution of design strength among LFRE. It is shown here that in order to minimize torsional response, one should use a strength/stiffness distribution combination that leads to the location of the center of strength, CV, and the center of stiffness, CR, on opposite sides of the center of mass, CM. A design‐oriented strength‐allocation procedure to arrive at such strength and stiffness distributions is presented. Its effectiveness in minimizing torsional response is demonstrated through comparison of seismic performance of structures having strength allocated on the basis of the proposed procedure with those following current UBC and EC8 torsional provisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it