Exciton relaxation in KBr and CaF2 at low temperature: molecular dynamics study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of a molecular-dynamics simulation of exciton relaxation in several ionic crystals at low temperature are reported. Both the lowest energy spin triplet and some of the low lying hole excited states are allowed to relax for the purpose of studying the radiation defect formation channels. The previously used semi-classical program has been modified to implement the solution of Newton’s equations with a 0.48 fs time step. The relaxation of an exciton localized on a single site (as Br0+e or F0+e, respectively) is studied at 10 K in KBr and in CaF2. In KBr the triplet self-trapped exciton leads to separated Frenkel pair in about 1–2 ps, followed by slow oscillation of the hole center along the (110) axis. The defect pair created is separated by about 10 Å (third-nearest neighbor). In CaF2, the relaxation reaches the geometry of the nearest Frenkel pair, with the hole center oriented along a (111) axis in about 0.3 ps at 10 K. However, at 80 K the system can undergo further relaxation into slightly more distant defect pairs. When the hole is excited to higher levels, the molecular bond of the hole center undergoes violent oscillations. In KBr, the hole center is found to form in the second-nearest-neighbor position within about 0.5 ps. The species formed are, however, different from the well-known primary radiation defects. A similar process is also observed in CaF2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it