MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031259972 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m312787200

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Corepressor Tup11 Interacts with the Iron-responsive Transcription Factor Fep1

2004· article· en· W2031259972 on OpenAlexaff
Sadri Znaidi, Benoit Pelletier, Yukio Mukai, Simon Labbé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizosaccharomyces pombeCorepressorSchizosaccharomycesTranscription factorBiologyGeneGeneticsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTranscription (linguistics)Regulation of gene expressionRepressorCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe fep1(+) gene encodes a GATA transcription factor that represses the expression of iron transport genes in response to elevated iron concentrations. This transcriptional response is altered only in strains harboring a combined deletion of both tup11(+) and tup12(+) genes. This suggests that Tup11 is capable of negatively regulating iron transport gene expression in the absence of Tup12 and vice versa. The tup11(+)- and tup12(+)-encoded proteins resemble the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tup1 corepressor. Using yeast two-hybrid analysis we show that Tup11 and Fep1 physically interact with each other. The C-terminal region from amino acids 242 to 564 of Fep1 is required for interaction with Tup11. Within this region, a minimal domain encompassing amino acids 405-541 was sufficient for Tup11-Fep1 association. Deletion mapping analysis revealed that the WD40-repeat sequence motifs of Tup11 are necessary for its interaction with Fep1. Analysis of Tup11 mutants with single amino acid substitutions in the WD40 repeats suggested that the Fep1 transcription factor interacts with a putative flat upper surface on the predicted beta-propeller structure of this motif. Further analysis by in vivo coimmunoprecipitation showed that Tup11 and Fep1 are physically associated. In vitro pull-down experiments further verified a direct interaction between the Fep1 C terminus and the Tup11 C-terminal WD40 repeat domain. Taken together, these results describe the first example of a physical interaction between a corepressor and an iron-sensing factor controlling the expression of iron uptake genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207