DRAMATIC PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN BARNACLE LEGS (BALANUS GLANDULA DARWIN): MAGNITUDE, AGE DEPENDENCE, AND SPEED OF RESPONSE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The precise dependence of barnacle leg form on flow suggests the wave-swept environment imposes strong selection on suspension feeding limbs. I conducted three experiments to determine the mechanism, age dependence, and response time of cirrus variation in the acorn barnacle Balanus glandula. (1) To test whether cirrus variation arises via genetic or environmental mechanisms, I transplanted juvenile barnacles from one wave-exposed and one protected population into high and low flow conditions. Both populations exhibited similar abilities to modify cirri in response to experimental velocities: transplanted barnacles grew legs up to 84% longer in low flow. A small (up to 24%), but significant difference between source populations suggested slight genetic divergence in leg form. (2) Because flow is heterogeneous over space and time, I tested whether cirrus plasticity was limited to juveniles by transplanting both juveniles and adults from exposed and protected shores into quiet water. Remarkably, both juveniles and adults from the wave-exposed population produced legs over 100% longer than the original population, whereas protected barnacles remained unchanged. (3) A third transplant of adults into quiet water demonstrated that wave-exposed B. glandula modified cirrus form very quickly-within 18 days, or one to two molts. Results from these experiments suggest that variation in cirrus form is largely environmentally induced, but genetic differences may account for some variation observed among field populations; spatial and temporal flow heterogeneity appear to have selected for extreme flexibility of feeding form throughout a barnacle's life; and flow heterogeneity in the wave-swept environment appears to have selected for rapid ecophenotypic responses in the form of feeding structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".