Structural Analysis of Polymer End Groups by Electrospray Ionization High-Energy Collision-Induced Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemical structures of polymer end groups play an important role in determining the functional properties of a polymeric system. We present a mass spectrometric method for determining end group structures. Polymeric ions are produced by electrospray ionization (ESI), and they are subject to source fragmentation in the ESI interface region to produce low-mass fragment ions. A series of source-fragment ions containing various numbers of monomer units are selected for high-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID) in a sector/time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer. It is shown that high-energy CID spectra of source-induced fragment ions are very informative for end group structure characterization. By comparing the CID spectra of fragment ions with those of known chemicals, it is possible to unambiguously identify the end group structures. The utility of this technique is illustrated for the analysis of two poly(ethylene glycol)-based slow-releasing drugs where detailed structural characterization is of significance for drug formulation, quality control, and regulatory approval. Practical issues related to the application of this method are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".