MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evolution of the type III secretion system and its effectors in plant–microbe interactions

2007· review· en· W2031307248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Phytologist · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsEffectorBiologyType three secretion systemSecretionHorizontal gene transferEvolutionary dynamicsVirulenceEvolutionary biologyGeneComputational biologyGeneticsPhylogeneticsCell biologyPopulationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Many bacterial plant pathogens require the type III secretion system (T3SS) and its effector proteins (T3SEs) to invade and extract nutrients from their hosts successfully. While the molecular function of this system is being studied intensively, we know comparatively little about the evolutionary and ecological pressures governing its fate over time, and even less about the detailed mechanisms underlying and driving complex T3SS‐mediated coevolutionary dynamics. In this review we summarize our current understanding of how host–pathogen interactions evolve, with a particular focus on the T3SS of bacterial plant pathogens. We explore the evolutionary origins of the T3SS relative to the closely related flagellar system, and investigate the evolutionary pressures on this secretion and translocation apparatus. We examine the evolutionary forces acting on T3SEs, and compare the support for vertical descent with modification of these virulence‐associated systems (pathoadaptation) vs horizontal gene transfer. We address the evolutionary origins of T3SEs from the perspective of both the evolutionary mechanisms that generate new effectors, and the mobile elements that may be the source of novel genetic material. Finally, we propose a number of questions raised by these studies, which may serve to guide our thinking about these complex processes. Contents Summary 33 I. Introduction 34 II. The type III secretion system and the plant immune system 34 III. The evolution of the type III secretion apparatus 36 IV. The evolution of type III secreted effectors 39 V. The origin of type III secreted effectors 41 VI. Conclusion and future directions 43 Acknowledgements 44 References 44

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it