MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031328795 · doi:10.1086/378265

SN 1993J VLBI. III. The Evolution of the Radio Shell

2003· article· en· W2031328795 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNebulaBrightnessRADIUSShell (structure)PulsarVery-long-baseline interferometryRidgeSupernovaCore (optical fiber)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sequence of images of supernova 1993J at 31 epochs, from 50 days to ~9 yr after shock breakout, shows the evolution of the expanding radio shell of an exploded star in detail. The images were obtained from 24 observing sessions at 8.4 GHz and 19 at 5.0 GHz and from our last session at 1.7 GHz. The images are all phase-referenced to the stable reference point of the core of the host galaxy M81. This allows us to display them relative to the supernova explosion center. The earliest image shows an almost unresolved source with a radius of 520 AU. The shell structure becomes discernible 175 days after shock breakout. The brightness of the ridge of the projected shell is not uniform, but rather varies by a factor of 2, having a distinct peak or maximum to the southeast and a gap or minimum to the west. Over the next ~350 days, this pattern rotates counterclockwise, with the gap rotating from west to north-northeast. After 2 years, the structure becomes more complex with hot spots developing in the east, south, and west. The pattern of modulation continues to change, and after 5 years the hot spots are located to the north-northwest, south, and south-southeast. After 9 years, the radio shell has expanded to a radius of 19,000 AU. The brightness in the center of the images is lower than expected for an optically thin, spherical shell. Absorption in the center is favored over a thinner shell in the back and/or front. Allowing for absorption, we find that the thickness of the shell is 25% ± 3% of its outer radius. We place a 3 σ upper limit of 4.4% on the mean polarization of the bright part of the shell, consistent with internal Faraday depolarization. We find no compact source in the central region above a brightness limit of 0.05 mJy beam -1 at 8.4 GHz, corresponding to 30% of the current spectral luminosity of the Crab Nebula. We conclude either that any pulsar nebula in the center of SN 1993J is much fainter than the Crab or that there is still significant internal radio absorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207