MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031336317 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2014.6947035

Road extraction from high resolution remote sensing image using multiresolution in case of major disaster

2014· article· en· W2031336317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale-invariant feature transformComputer scienceFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceImage resolutionFalse alarmComputer visionContext (archaeology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road extraction is a topical research because of complexity due to his large topological variability. Increasing the spatial resolution generates noise which makes extraction difficult, especially in case of major disaster in an urban context. This problem increases false alarm rates and generally affects the performance of road extraction algorithm. Our aim is to improve the quality of roads extraction after adaptation of the Lowe's SIFT descriptors (scale-invariant feature transform) jointly with spectral angle algorithm. The characterization is performed on two image at various resolution images, respectively representing a rural and urban disaster area, captured by Quickbird satellite. Our approach significantly reduces the amount of false detection and shows an overall accuracy of up to nearly 30% in some cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207