MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031337233 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450830309

Ébullition par Convection Forcée des Mélanges Eau-Ammoniac dans un Tube Vertical

2008· article· fr· W2031337233 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tahar Khir, Ammar Ben Brahim, Rahim K. Jassim

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsChemistryHumanitiesThermodynamicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une étude expérimentale est développée sur l'ébullition des mélanges eau-ammoniac dans un tube vertical lisse de diamètre interne de 6 mm. Un générateur de vapeur constitué de deux tubes coaxiaux en acier inoxydable est utilisé comme veine d'essai. Les coefficients de transfert thermique locaux sont déterminés le long du tube interne pour les gammes suivantes des variables opératoires : densité du flux thermique (29.93 − 99.79 kW/m2), densité du flux massique (35.36 − 99.04 kg/m2·s), débit massique du mélange H2O-NH3 (0.001−0.03 kg/s) et concentration massique en ammoniac (49%, 55 % et 61%). L'influence des variables opératoires sur les coefficients de transfert thermique est analysée. Trois méthodes sont utilisées pour prédire les coefficients de transfert thermique en ébullition. Les résultats obtenus confirment la validité de la corrélation de Mishra et al. (1981) et celle de Bennett et Chen (1980) corrigée, pour la prédiction du coefficient de transfert thermique en ébullition des mélanges eau-ammoniac. Ces corrélations permettent de prédire les coefficients de transfert avec une déviation moyenne de ± 20 %. An experimental study has been conducted on the forced convective boiling heat transfer of ammonia-water mixtures flowing inside a 6 mm inner diameter vertical smooth tube. Using a water-heated double pipe type generator, the local heat transfer coefficients are measured inside the inner tube for a range of heat flux density (29.93 — 99.79 kW/m2), mass flux density (35.36 — 99.04 kg/m2·s), mass flow rate (0.001 — 0.03 kg/s) and ammonia mass concentration (49%, 55% and 61%). The effect of the experimental parameters on the heat transfer coefficients is analysed. Three methods are used to predict the boiling heat transfer coefficients. Experimental data were compared with the available correlations. The obtained results confirm the good performance of the Mishra et al. (1981) and Bennett-Chen's (1980) correlations in predicting the convective boiling heat transfer coefficient of NH3-H2O mixtures. These methods are able to predict the boiling heat transfer data within an average accuracy of ± 20 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207