Littérature, représentations de soi et mobilité sociale dans le québec du XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Est-il possible de faire une histoire des manières « populaires » de se raconter pour les périodes antérieures à la démocratisation de l’écrire ? Sans traces substantielles, l’exercice est à tout le moins ardu. En revanche, l’historien dispose de représentations de soi sophistiquées produites par certains individus lettrés issus de milieux modestes. L’analyse d’une partie de la production littéraire d’un représentant de cette catégorie, Antoine Gérin-Lajoie, permet de suivre le travail qui consiste à passer d’une narration autobiographique à une réflexion d’ordre sociologique. Elle montre que c’est justement l’expérience des problèmes liés à l’acquisition d’une culture savante et à la mobilité sociale qui fonde, en partie, ces écritures de soi et du monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".