MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031356903 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2008.00632

Effect of Shading after Anthesis on Starch Accumulation and Activities of the Related Enzymes in Wheat Grain

2008· article· en· W2031356903 on OpenAlexaff
Wenyang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadingAnthesisStarchWheat grainAgronomyBiologyEnzymeBotanyChemistryHorticultureFood scienceCultivarBiochemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

摘要: 2005—2007年选用小麦品种济麦20和山农1391, 在大田试验条件下研究了花后不同阶段弱光对籽粒淀粉积累、淀粉粒分布及相关酶活性的影响。结果表明, 花后不同阶段弱光显著降低成熟期籽粒淀粉积累量, 但提高了籽粒直链淀粉含量。花后不同阶段弱光使籽粒A型淀粉粒比例显著增加, B型淀粉粒比例显著降低。不同阶段弱光处理对籽粒淀粉积累的影响程度不同, 灌浆中期的效应大于灌浆前期。Logistic方程拟合籽粒淀粉积累进程发现, 花后弱光对籽粒淀粉积累量的影响, 主要是通过影响其平均积累速率与活跃期积累速率, 而不是积累持续期。花后弱光显著降低小麦磷酸蔗糖合酶(SPS)、蔗糖合酶(SS)和腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)的活性。灌浆前期弱光使束缚态淀粉合酶(GBSS)、可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)活性高于对照或与对照无显著差异, 而灌浆中期弱光使这两种酶的活性均显著低于对照。灌浆前期弱光减少了淀粉合成底物的供应, 系旗叶SPS活性、籽粒SS及AGPase活性下降所致; 而灌浆中期弱光除淀粉合成底物减少外, 籽粒淀粉合酶活性亦降低。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACTA AGRONOMICA SINICASame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207