MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2031362848 · doi:10.1117/12.2073431

Transmittance of upwelling radiance at the sea surface measured in the field

2014· article· en· W2031362848 on OpenAlexaff
Jianwei Wei, Zhongping Lee, Nima Pahlevan, Marlon R. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadianceTransmittanceRadiometerRemote sensingOpticsEnvironmental scienceNadirUpwellingOcean colorUltravioletLight fieldPhysicsMaterials scienceGeologySatelliteOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transmittance of upwelling radiance at the air-water interface is a critical quantity in ocean color remote sensing and is usually approximated as a constant (~0.54) for nadir-viewing geometries. Despite its important role, the radiance transmittance has never been measured and validated. In this paper, we present direct measurements of the spectral radiance transmittance in calm seas. The measurements were obtained by a customized instrument package equipped with two collocated radiometers. One radiometer measures the upwelling radiance just below the surface (Lu(0-)) while the other one directly records the water-leaving radiance (Lw) simultaneously. The ratio of measured Lw to Lu(0-) provides the transmittance. Our analyses suggest that the transmittance remains constant within ultraviolet and visible domain (350–700 nm) and is generally consistent with the theoretical approximations. In particular, the observed transmittance is within ±10% of the theoretical value for most portions of the spectral bands (350–600 nm). Within the red portion of the spectrum, the deviations are larger but are still less than 20%. The field observations suggest an optical closure is reached.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→